Gregory v. Novak
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtLeeson, J.
Plaintiffs appeal a summary judgment dismissing their claims for deceit and breach of contract. We review to determine whether, viewing the facts in the light most favorable to plaintiffs, the non-moving parties, there is no genuine issue of material fact, and defendants are entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Park v. Hoffard, 315 Or 624, 627, 847 P2d 852 (1993). We reverse the summary judgment as it relates to plaintiffs’ claim for deceit, and otherwise affirm.
Prior to 1989, defendants owned an apartment complex, known as the Crest Apartments (the complex), which included a swimming…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Riley Hill General Contractor, Inc. v. Tandy Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1987
- Krause v. Eugene Dodge, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1973
- Elizaga v. Kaiser Foundation Hospitals, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1971
- Park v. HoffardOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Coy v. StarlingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- United States v. Daniel I. Colton, United States of America v. Daniel I. ColtonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
- Maitland v. Mitchell (In re Harris Pine Mills)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Meade v. Cedarapids, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- In re Ford Motor Co. Vehicle Paint LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1998
- Oregon Public Employees' Retirement Board v. Simat, Helliesen & EichnerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.