Legal Opinion

Dietrich v. Community Traction Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1964No. 38623PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMatthias, J.

The Court of Appeals in the instant case held that the defendant bus company owed no duty to a passenger who had alighted and taken two or three steps before he was injured. On the same question, in the Mueller and O’Reilly cases, supra, the Courts of Appeals for Hamilton and Cuyahoga Counties allowed recovery for the passenger, even though he had alighted and proceeded some distance at the time he was injured.

Section 6, Article IV of the Ohio Constitution, provides as follows:

“* * * whenever the judges of a Court of Appeals find that a judgment upon which they have agreed is in conflict with…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Parker v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  2. Harris v. Atlantic Greyhound CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  3. Jackson v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Brown v. Metropolitan Transit AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
  5. Houston Transit Co. v. ZimmermanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Debie v. Cochran Pharmacy-Berwick, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Southwest Ohio Regional Transit Authority v. Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 627Ohio Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Feldman v. HowardOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Southwest Ohio Regional Transit Auth. v. Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 627Ohio Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Cleveland Board of Education v. International Brotherhood of Firemen & Oilers Local 701Ohio Court of Appeals · 1997

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API