Legal Opinion
Southwest Ohio Regional Transit Authority v. Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 627
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided March 7, 2001No. 00-21PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLundberg Stratton, J.
Appellee, Southwest Ohio Regional Transit Authority (“SORTA”), operates a mass transit system in the greater Cincinnati area. Appellant, Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 627 (“Union”), is a labor union that represents certain SORTA employees, including bus maintenance workers. SORTA and the Union negotiated a collective bargaining agreement (“CBA”). Under the CBA, SORTA or the Union may submit to arbitration any otherwise unresolved grievance that arises from the interpretation or application of its terms. The CBA also provided that “[t]here shall be no discharge, suspension or other…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United Paperworkers International Union v. Misco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- W. R. Grace & Co. v. Local Union 759, International Union of the United Rubber, Cork, Linoleum & Plastic WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Eastern Associated Coal Corp. v. United Mine Workers, District 17Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Muschany v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Mahoning County Board of Mental Retardation & Developmental Disabilities v. Mahoning County TMR Education Ass'nOhio Supreme Court · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- New Jersey Turnpike Authority v. Local 196, I.F.P.T.E.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2007
- City of Piqua v. Fraternal Order of Police, Ohio Labor Council, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
- International Ass'n of Firefighters, Local 67 v. City of ColumbusOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- Southwest Ohio Regional Transit Auth. v. Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 627Ohio Supreme Court · 2001
- City of Cincinnati v. Queen City Lodge No. 69Ohio Court of Appeals · 2005
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.