Legal Opinion

Harris v. Atlantic Greyhound Corporation

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 13, 1956No. 395PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.

Defendant, a common"carrier, was not an insurer of the safety of its passengers. Its liability, if any, was for negligence proximately causing injury to its passengers. Hollingsworth v. Skelding, 142 N.C. 246, 55 S.E. 212, expressly disapproving a contrary dictum in Daniel v. R. R., 117 N.C. 592, 23 S.E. 327; White v. Chappell, 219 N.C. 652, 14 S.E. 2d 843; Humphries v. Coach Co., 228 N.C. 399, 45 S.E. 2d 546; Jenkins v. Coach Co., 231 N.C. 208, 56 S.E. 2d 571.

This Court has quoted with approval Lord Mansfield’s definition of the carrier’s legal duty to its passengers, viz.: “As far as human…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Wood v. North Carolina Public-Service Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  2. Citizens National Bank v. PhillipsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  3. White v. . ChappellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  4. Singletary v. NixonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  5. Daniel v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1895

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Feldman v. HowardOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Potts v. HowserSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  3. Mann v. VIRGINIA DARE TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, INC.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  4. Charlotte City Coach Lines, Inc. v. Brotherhood of Railroad TrainmenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  5. Jackson v. StancilSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API