Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Washington

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 2002No. 2002-1131PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 97 Ohio St.3d 483.] OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. WASHINGTON. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Washington,

2002-Ohio-6723.] Attorneys at law—Misconduct—Indefinite suspension—Neglecting interests of two clients—Failing to return unearned fees—Misrepresenting to one of the clients that the work was done in his case—Failing to cooperate in disciplinary investigation. (No. 2002-1131—Submitted August 27, 2002—Decided December 18, 2002.) ON CERTIFIED REPORT by the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of the Supreme…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. JudgeOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. KieftOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. KieftOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. WashingtonOhio Supreme Court · 2002

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dayton Bar Ass'n v. FoxOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. EmersonOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. ClavnerOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Erie-Huron Counties Joint Certified Grievance Committee v. HuberOhio Supreme Court · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API