Legal Opinion

Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Kieft

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 2002No. 01-1881PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

In a complaint filed on February 5, 2001, relator, Cincinnati Bar Association, charged respondent, David W. Kieft of Cincinnati, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0042465, with misconduct in violation of the Code of Professional Responsibility and of Gov.Bar R. V(4)(G). Respondent was served the complaint but did not answer. Relator accordingly moved for default pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(F).

The Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of the Supreme Court appointed a master commissioner to review the default motion. The master commissioner found that respondent had committed…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lorain County Bar Ass'n v. FernandezOhio Supreme Court · 2000

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. KodishOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Richland County Bar Ass'n v. BrickleyOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Richland Cty. Bar Assn. v. BrickleyOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. JurczenkoOhio Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Disciplinary Counsel v. WashingtonOhio Supreme Court · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API