Legal Opinion · Dissent

Erie-Huron Counties Joint Certified Grievance Committee v. Huber

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 22, 2006No. 2005-1542Published

1DissentMoyer, C.J.

{¶ 17} I respectfully dissent. In recommending that respondent be indefinitely suspended for his misconduct, the board considered the aggravating and mitigating factors listed in Section 10 of the Rules and Regulations Governing Procedure on Complaints and Hearings Before the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline (“BCGD Proc.Reg.”). As aggravating factors, thé board found that respondent had spoken dishonestly to Daniel Hall and the Mantzes during his representation of them, had engaged in a pattern of misconduct, and had committed multiple offenses. BCGD Proc.Reg. 10(B)(1)(b),…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. WeaverOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Columbus Bar Ass'n v. TorianOhio Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. TreneffOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. GriffithOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Disciplinary Counsel v. WashingtonOhio Supreme Court · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API