Legal Opinion

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Washington

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 2002No. 2002-1131PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

*484{¶ 1} This case requires us to decide the sanction for an attorney who neglected the interests of two clients, failed to return the unearned fees those clients paid, misrepresented to one of the clients the work she had done in his case, and failed to cooperate in the investigation of that misconduct.

{¶ 2} The Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline found that respondent, Dale Washington of Cleveland, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0037496, committed those acts and thereby violated DR 1-102(A)(4) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation), (5) (conduct…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. JudgeOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. KieftOhio Supreme Court · 2002

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. WashingtonOhio Supreme Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API