Legal Opinion

Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Kieft

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 2002No. 2001-1881PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 94 Ohio St.3d 429.] CINCINNATI BAR ASSOCIATION v. KIEFT. [Cite as Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Kieft,

2002-Ohio-1234.] Attorneys at law—Misconduct—Indefinite suspension—Neglect of an entrusted legal matter—Failing to carry out contract of employment—Failing to promptly return clients’ funds or other property—Failing to cooperate in investigation of grievance. (No. 01-1881—Submitted December 12, 2001—Decided March 6, 2002.) ON CERTIFIED REPORT by the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of the Supreme Court, No. 01-11.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. KieftOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Lorain County Bar Ass'n v. FernandezOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Lorain Cty. Bar Assn. v. FernandezOhio Supreme Court · 2000

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Richland County Bar Ass'n v. BrickleyOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. JurczenkoOhio Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. WashingtonOhio Supreme Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API