Legal Opinion

Trend Homes, Inc. v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 2, 2005No. F046715PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GOMES, J. —

Petitioner, a builder of single-family homes, challenges the trial court’s denial of its motion to compel judicial reference of the underlying construction defect action brought against it by homebuyers. The trial court refused to enforce a clause in home purchase contracts requiring homebuyers who sue petitioner to submit the dispute to judicial reference on the ground the clause is unconscionable. In contrast to the trial court, we find the provision enforceable and grant the relief petitioner seeks.

STATEMENT OF FACTS

Petitioner Trend Homes, Inc. (Trend), constructed…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Armendariz v. Found. Health Psychcare Servs., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Little v. Auto Stiegler, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London v. Superior Court of Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Keating v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Wheeler v. St. Joseph HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Bruni v. DidionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  2. Tarrant Bell Property, LLC v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Higgins v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  4. McCaffrey Group, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  5. Treo @ Kettner Homeowners Ass'n v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API