Legal Opinion
Treo @ Kettner Homeowners Ass'n v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 12, 2008No. D052402PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BENKE, Acting P. J.
Petitioner Treo @ Kettner Homeowners Association (Association), a homeowners association of a condominium project in downtown San Diego, sued real party in interest Intergulf Construction Corporation, developer of the project, and other real parties in interest (collectively Intergulf) for alleged construction defects. A provision of Association’s covenants, conditions and restrictions (CC&R’s) required that all disputes between it and Intergulf be decided by a general judicial reference pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 638. Intergulf moved for an order…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Frances T. v. Village Green Owners Assn.California Supreme Court · 1986
- Nahrstedt v. Lakeside Village Condominium Assn.California Supreme Court · 1994
- Grafton Partners L.P. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- Exline v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1855
- Villa Milano Homeowners Ass'n v. Il DavorgeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Pinnacle Museum Tower Ass'n v. Pinnacle Market Development (US), LLCCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
- Tarrant Bell Property, LLC v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
- O'Donoghue v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Payton v. CSI Elec. Contractors, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Pinnacle Museum Tower Ass'n v. Pinnacle Market Development (US), LLCCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.