Bruni v. Didion
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RICHLI, J.
Plaintiffs purchased single-family homes, which came with what they were told was “an added bonus” or “extra protection”—an express limited warranty. Actually, the warranty provided coverage, subject to sweeping exclusions, for the whole home for just one year, and for the electrical, plumbing, and mechanical systems for just two years; after that, the only coverage it provided was for “load-bearing elements,” and then only if the damage to them made the home “unsafe, unsanitary, or otherwise unlivable.” Some versions of the warranty purported to relieve the builder of any…
2Cases cited63 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Howsam v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by80 opinions
- In Re Morgan Stanley & Co., Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2009
- Parada v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Brown v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.California Court of Appeal · 2008
- Greenspan v. LADT, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Tiri v. Lucky Chances, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2014
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.