Legal Opinion

Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County

California Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 2001No. S084057PublishedCited by 170 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MOSK, J.

We granted review to resolve an important issue arising under the standard comprehensive general liability insurance policy.

In one provision, the standard policy imposes on the insurer a duty to defend the insured—in typical language, it generally states that the insurer has a “duty to defend” the insured “in any suit seeking damages” for harm alleged within coverage.

- In another provision, the standard policy imposes on the insurer a duty to indemnify the insured—again in typical language, it generally states that the insurer “will pay all sums that the insured becomes legally…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Curtis v. LoetherSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. AIU Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Comunale v. Traders & General InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Buss v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by170 opinions

  1. Central Illinois Light Co. v. Home InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Johnson Controls, Inc. v. Employers Insurance of WausauWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Wolf v. Walt Disney Pictures and TelevisionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  4. Powerine Oil Co., Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Hartford Casualty Insurance v. Swift Distribution, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2014

165 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API