Legal Opinion

Little v. Auto Stiegler, Inc.

California Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 2003No. S101435PublishedCited by 191 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MORENO, J.

In this case, we consider four interlocking questions: (1) Is a provision in a mandatory employment arbitration agreement that permits either party to “appeal” an arbitration award of more than $50,000 to a second arbitrator, unconscionable; (2) if it is unconscionable, then should that unconscionable provision be severed from the rest of the arbitration agreement and the agreement enforced, or is the entire agreement invalid; (3) if the former, then in reviewing the rest of the arbitration agreement, do the minimum requirements for arbitration of unwaivable statutory claims…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Green Tree Financial Corp.-Alabama v. RandolphSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Southland Corp. v. KeatingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. CasarottoSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Armendariz v. Found. Health Psychcare Servs., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by191 opinions

  1. Connie A. Nagrampa v. Mailcoups, Inc. The American Arbitration AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  2. Pinnacle Museum Tower Ass'n v. Pinnacle Market Development (US), LLCCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Discover Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Catherine Ingle v. Circuit City Stores, Inc., a Virginia CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  5. Oto, L. L.C. v. KhoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019

186 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API