Legal Opinion

Togasaki v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided February 4, 1925No. 2424PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGeaham, Presiding Judge

The evidence shows that the material imported in this case is a Japanese food product called “nori tsukudani.” It is prepared as follows: An edible salt water seaweed, called “nori,” sometimes growing wild, sometimes cultivated, is cut from the rocks upon which it grows, with knives. The leaves of the plant are then washed in fresh water, sun dried and cut into pieces about an inch long. These are cooked for about 10 minutes with shoyu and sugar, the *464material then placed in tin cans and again boiled, after which the cans are hermetically sealed. The product contains about 85 per cent nori, 12…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Nix v. HeddenSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Ishimitsu v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1921
  3. United States v. Danker & MarstonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
  4. United States v. Rice Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1919
  5. United States v. WallaceCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. United States v. Hillier's Son Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  2. United States v. R. Hillier's Son Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  3. Nippon Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  4. Bing Kee & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1946
  5. Biological Raw Products Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1950

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API