Legal Opinion

Bing Kee & Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided May 23, 1946No. C. D. 1006PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cline, Judge:

This is a suit against the United States arising at the port of San Francisco by protest against the collector’s assessment of duty on green water chestnuts imported from China at the rate of 50 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 774 of the. Tariff Act of 1930 as vegetables in their natural state. Plaintiff claims that the merchandise is properly dutiable under paragraph 752 as fruits in their natural state or as fruits, prepared or preserved.

The pertinent provisions of the tariff act are as follows:

Par. 774. Vegetables in their natural state * * * all other, not specially…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Nix v. HeddenSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Togasaki v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  3. Moscahlades Bros. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  4. Quong Lee v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1942
  5. United States v. Davies, Turner & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Tower v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1947
  2. Bing Kee Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1949
  3. Wo Kee v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API