Legal Opinion

United States v. Danker & Marston

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided February 1, 1912No. 731PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers,.G. A. 7255 (T. D. 31798).

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, Judge

This appeal involves the classification of a commodity imported at Boston, Mass., and known as gum tragasol. Some of the gum was imported under the tariff act of 1897 and some of it under- the tariff act of 1909. The collector of customs rated the product as a nononumorated manufactured article and accordingly the importations were assessed for duty at 20 per cent ad valorem either under the provisions of section 6 of the act of 1897 or under the provisions of paragraph 480 of the act of 1909 as the date of importation might require. With the exception that the word “section” is substituted…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. Continental Color & Chemical Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Togasaki v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  2. Naumes Forwarding Service v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1950
  3. United States v. R. Hillier's Son Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  4. United States v. Maine Central RailroadCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
  5. Cone v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API