Legal Opinion

United States v. R. Hillier's Son Co.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 7, 1928No. 3053PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGkaham, Presiding Judge

The imported material involved in this protest is commonly known as soapbark siftings and was imported from Germany. It consists of a fine powder, in which are mixed very small shreds of bark-like substance. It is produced from processing the bark of a Chilean tree known as quillai or quillajo. The evidence shows that large pieces or slabs of the bark are taken from Chile to Germany, there processed, and the processed material then imported into this and other countries. In producing the material in question here the bark is fed into a cutting machine, where it is cut into small chips. After…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Togasaki v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  2. United States v. Danker & MarstonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
  3. Vandegrift v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  4. United States v. Rice Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1919
  5. United States v. American Chicle Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1920

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Joseph Schmidt, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1942
  2. Geo. S. Bush & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1951
  3. Geo. S. Bush & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1943
  4. Judson Sheldon Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1944
  5. Knickerbocker Mills Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1941

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API