Legal Opinion

Biological Raw Products Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided June 20, 1950No. C. D. 1253PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cole, Judge:

Vandegrift & Co. v. United States, 13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 30, T. D. 40865, concerned certain ovarian and pituitary cattle glands containing active ingredients used by drug manufacturers. While the fresh gland was most desirable, it could not be safely transported from Argentina, the country of exportation, unless continuously frozen prior to the time of use. Lack of sufficient refrigerator space, when required, made shipment of the fresh glands impractical. The only feasible method of transporting the glands, to retain the valuable therapeutic substances, was to dry and grind them,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. G. D. Searle & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1948
  2. Togasaki v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  3. United States v. Danker & MarstonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
  4. Vandegrift v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  5. Roessler & Hasslacher Chemical Co. v. United StatesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1899

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dow Chemical Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
  2. Thompson Hayward Chemical Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1951
  3. Van Gelder-Fanto Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API