Legal Opinion

Shoultz v. Monfort of Colorado, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided February 7, 1985No. 82-1293PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLLOWAY, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff-appellant Cleo F. Shoultz timely appeals the dismissal of his action and amended complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Plaintiff brought this action under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1343, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1985 and 1986, and 21 U.S.C. § 675.1 We affirm.

*320I

Plaintiff Shoultz was employed as a meat inspector by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Food Safety and Quality Service, Meat and Poultry Inspection Program. Before October 4, 1977, he was assigned to inspection duties at the Greeley, Colorado, meat processing and…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Davis v. PassmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Carlson v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Phelps v. Wichita Eagle-BeaconCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
  2. Mangels v. PenaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
  3. Phelps v. Wichita Eagle-BeaconCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
  4. Brever v. Rockwell International CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
  5. Wilder v. ProkopCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API