Legal Opinion
Wilder v. Prokop
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided May 10, 1988No. 84-2540PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOLLOWAY, Chief Judge.
The plaintiff-appellant, John J. Wilder, appeals from the district court’s memorandum order and opinion which granted the defendants-appellees’ motion for summary judgment, denied the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, and dismissed with prejudice the complaint. The named appel-lees are Ruth T. Prokop, Chairwoman of the Merit Systems Protection Board of the United States; the Merit Systems Protec*616tion Board (MSPB); the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and Samuel R. Pierce, in his official capacity as the Secretary of HUD (collectively…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Henry WOLF, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BUSS (AMERICA) INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Williams v. RiceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- Setliff v. Memorial Hospital of Sheridan CountyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Howell Petroleum Corp. v. Leben Oil Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- O'LOUGHLIN v. the Pritchard Corp.District Court, D. Kansas · 1997
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.