Legal Opinion
Mangels v. Pena
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided April 25, 1986No. 84-2730PublishedCited by 107 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge.
Douglas C. Mangels and Randal K. Man-gels brought this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1982), alleging due process deprivations arising from the termination of their employment with the Denver Fire Department. The district court dismissed the complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, and the Mangels appealed. We affirm on the alternative ground that the complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. See Wright v. Lane County District Court, 647 F.2d 940, 941 (9th Cir.1981) (per curiam).
I
A complaint may not be dismissed for failure to state a…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by107 opinions
- Cynthia Bloch and Thomas Bloch v. Sheriff L. John RibarCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Jacobs, Visconsi & Jacobs, Co. v. City of LawrenceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Hicks v. City of WatongaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Dale Schaper v. City of Huntsville, Gene Pipes and Hank EckhardtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
- Thomas B. Hennigh v. City of Shawnee, Terry Powell, and Hank LandCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
102 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.