Legal Opinion
Metropolitan Van & Storage, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided October 6, 2011No. 09-473CPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*180OPINION
HORN, Judge.
Plaintiff Metropolitan Van and Storage, Ine. (Metropolitan) filed an application for costs pursuant to Rule 54(d) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (RCFC) (2011) and for attorneys’ fees and other expenses pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C.A. § 2412 (West 2011).1 In Metropolitan Van and Storage, Inc. v. United, States, 92 Fed.Cl. 232 (2010), this court issued an opinion on the merits of plaintiffs bid protest case and vacated the award of a contract to Guardian Moving and Storage Co. (Guardian).
FINDINGS OF FACT
The facts of…
2Cases cited99 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Astrue v. RatliffSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Hyperion, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Kwv, Incorporated v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Miles Construction, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Prochazka v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Bcpeabody Construction Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.