Legal Opinion
Bcpeabody Construction Services, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided July 23, 2014No. 1:13-cv-00378PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Application by a prevailing plaintiff for an award of attorneys’ fees and expenses pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412; no substantial justification for the government’s position; hourly rates; expenses; bond premiums as expenses
OPINION AND ORDER
LETTOW, Judge.
A judgment on the administrative record was issued in plaintiffs favor in this post-award bid protest contesting a construction contract awarded by the Department of the Army, United States Army Corps of Engineers, Jacksonville District (“the Corps” or “the government”) for work in Okeechobee County, Florida.…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Commissioner, Immigration & Naturalization Service v. JeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Missouri v. Jenkins Ex Rel. AgyeiSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Crawford Fitting Co. v. J. T. Gibbons, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Scarborough v. PrincipiSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hyperion, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- 2m Research Services, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020