Legal Opinion
Hyperion, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided September 29, 2014No. 1:13-cv-01012PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Application by a prevailing plaintiff for an award of attorneys’ fees and expenses pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412; no substantial justification for the government’s position; reduction in an attorney’s hours for work ordinarily done by a paralegal
OPINION AND ORDER
LETTOW, Judge.
A judgment on the administrative record was issued in favor of plaintiff, Hyperion Inc., in this post-award bid protest contesting a contract awarded by the United States Amy (“the Army” or “the government”) to provide installation and infrastructure upgrades to fiber optic cable networks…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Commissioner, Immigration & Naturalization Service v. JeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Scarborough v. PrincipiSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Taniguchi v. Kan Pacific Saipan, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Centech Group, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Hyperion, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Q Integrated Companies, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Park Properties Associates, L.P. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Small v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Brass v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.