Legal Opinion

Prochazka v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided May 30, 2014No. 1:06-cv-00827PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND FINAL ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S CLAIM FOR ATTORNEY FEES, EXPENSES, AND COSTS UNDER THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT

BRADEN, Judge.

Congress enacted the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412, to enable a plaintiff, like Captain Frank J. Proehazka (“Captain Prochazka”), to obtain competent legal counsel to pursue monetary claims against the United States, in complex cases, such as this one. Of course, the statutorily defined fee structure does not come close to compensating counsel, such as Thomas A Coulter or his firm LeClair Ryan, P.C., for the market…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dept. of Health and Human ResourcesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. Commissioner, Immigration & Naturalization Service v. JeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Whitman v. American Trucking Assns., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ulysses, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
  2. Small v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
  3. Brass v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
  4. Small v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
  5. Stromness Mpo, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API