Legal Opinion

Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 25, 1953No. Appeals, No. 173PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Reno, J.,

These appeals by the City of Pittsburgh have brought up for review two orders of the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission relating to increases of fares by the Pittsburgh Railways Company. No. 27 April Term, 1953, concerns an increase of the basic street car fare from 15 cents to 17 cents, and No. 173 April Term, 1952, deals with an increase from 17 cents to 20 cents. Prior increases are discussed and decided in Pittsburgh v. Pa. P. U. C., 165 Pa. Superior Ct. 519, 69 A. 2d 844; Pittsburgh v. Pa. P. U. C., 168 Pa. Superior Ct. 95, 78 A. 2d 35; and Pittsburgh v. Pa. P. U.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  2. Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  3. Philadelphia v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  4. Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  5. Philadelphia v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. West Penn Power Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  2. Metropolitan Edison Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Popowsky v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Wall v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  5. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API