Popowsky v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
PELLEGRINI, Judge.
Irwin A. Popowsky, the Consumer Advocate of Pennsylvania (Consumer Advocate), the Pennsylvania Cable Television Association (Cable Association), MCI Telecommunications Corporation, Inc. (MCI), Central Atlantic Payphone Association (Payphone Association), AT & T Communications of Pennsylvania, Inc. (AT & T), Digital Direct of Pittsburgh, Inc. (Digital Direct) and the City of Pittsburgh (Pittsburgh), collectively referred to as the Challengers, appeal a decision of the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (Commission) approving Bell Atlantic — Pennsylvania, Inc.’s (Bell),…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Uniontown Area School District v. Pennsylvania Human Relations CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Terminato v. Pennsylvania National InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission v. Pennsylvania Gas & Water Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- National Fuel Gas Distribution Corp. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Cytemp Specialty Steel Division v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Popowsky v. Pennsylvania Public UtilitySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Martin Media v. Department of TransportationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- McCloskey v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Popowsky v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Mid-Atlantic Power Supply Ass'n v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.