Legal Opinion
O'Hara v. State
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 14, 1991No. 13967PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHull, J.
The plaintiffs, Mitchel J. O’Hara, Sr., and Mitchel J. O’Hara, Jr., brought an action to recover damages for breach of contract against the defendant *630Alenter, Inc. (Alenter),1 based on the defendant’s failure to convey a parcel of real property to the plaintiffs. The trial court, West, J., rendered judgment for the plaintiffs. The defendant appealed and the plaintiffs cross appealed to the Appellate Court. We transferred the appeals to this court pursuant to Practice Book § 4023 and we now affirm.
The material facts are either stipulated or undisputed. On March 7, 1979, John Lobdell conveyed…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Novella v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Kaplan v. KaplanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. MurphySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Cecio Bros., Inc. v. FeldmannSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
- Barnes v. BarnesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Gazo v. City of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Wadia Enterprises, Inc. v. HirschfeldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Chmielewski v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Bank of Boston Connecticut v. SchlesingerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Commissioner of Health Services v. Youth Challenge of Greater Hartford, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.