Legal Opinion

In re Kasheema L.

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided January 25, 2000No. AC 17767PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HENNESSY, J.

The respondent mother1 appeals from the trial court’s judgments terminating her parental rights with respect to her four children. The respondent claims that the trial court failed to adhere to General Statutes (Rev. to 1997) § 17a-112 (c) (3) (B)2 in finding that she failed to achieve such a degree of personal rehabilitation as would encourage the belief that within a reasonable time, she could assume a responsible position in the lives of her children. We affirm the judgments of the trial court.

The following facts and procedural history are relevant to this appeal. The…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In re Luis C.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  2. In re TabithaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
  3. In re Hector L.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1999
  4. In re Christina V.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1995
  5. In re Drew R.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. In re Shane P.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2000
  2. In re Mariah S.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2000
  3. In re Sheena I.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  4. In re Tyscheicka H.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2000
  5. In re William R.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2001

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API