In re Drew R.
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LAVER Y, J.
This is an appeal by the respondent father from the judgment of the trial court terminating his parental rights with respect to his son. The respondent claims that the trial court (1) was too restrictive in its consideration of the evidence of interest, concern or responsibility for the welfare of the child, (2) was incorrect when it found that reasonable efforts toward reunification had been fostered by the department of children and families (DCF), and (3) incorrectly shifted the burden of permanency planning from DCF to the father. We affirm the judgment of the trial…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In re Juvenile AppealSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- In re Rayna M.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1987
- In re Christina V.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- In Re Adoption of WebbCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975
- In re Maximina V.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1997
3Cited by20 opinions
- In re Tabitha T.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- In re Savanna M.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- In re Shane P.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- In re Alissa N.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- In re Jonathon G.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2001
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.