In re Sheena I.
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FOTI, J.
The respondent mother appeals from the judgments of the trial court terminating her parental rights with respect to her two minor children, S and J. On appeal, the respondent mother claims that the court improperly concluded that (1) she failed to achieve personal rehabilitation within the meaning of General Statutes (Rev. to 1999) § 17a-112 (c) (3) (B) and (2) termination of her parental rights was in her children’s best interests. We affirm the judgments of the trial court.
In a comprehensive memorandum of decision dated June 12, 2000, the court recited the following facts and…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- In re Luis C.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- In re Eden F.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- In Re Juvenile Appeal (84-3)Connecticut Appellate Court · 1983
- In re Michael M.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1992
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- In re Joshua S.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- In re Gary B.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- In re Davonta V.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- In re Messiah S.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- In re Vanna A.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.