Legal Opinion

In re Sheena I.

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided June 12, 2001No. AC 21021PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FOTI, J.

The respondent mother appeals from the judgments of the trial court terminating her parental rights with respect to her two minor children, S and J. On appeal, the respondent mother claims that the court improperly concluded that (1) she failed to achieve personal rehabilitation within the meaning of General Statutes (Rev. to 1999) § 17a-112 (c) (3) (B) and (2) termination of her parental rights was in her children’s best interests. We affirm the judgments of the trial court.

In a comprehensive memorandum of decision dated June 12, 2000, the court recited the following facts and…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  2. In re Luis C.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  3. In re Eden F.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  4. In Re Juvenile Appeal (84-3)Connecticut Appellate Court · 1983
  5. In re Michael M.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1992

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In re Joshua S.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
  2. In re Gary B.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  3. In re Davonta V.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2006
  4. In re Messiah S.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2012
  5. In re Vanna A.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2004

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API