Legal Opinion
See v. Joughin
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 8, 1937No. Civ. 5643PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.
The plaintiff has appealed from a judgment of dismissal of an action which was rendered against her pursuant to an order sustaining separate general and special demurrers to a second amended complaint without leave to amend the pleading. It is contended the complaint states a good cause of action to set aside another judgment of foreclosure of a mortgage in a previous action, and that the court abused its discretion in not permitting the complaint to be amended.
The second amended complaint contains three counts. The first cause attempts to allege facts constituting extrinsic fraud as grounds…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Pico v. CohnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Flood v. TempletonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Buckley v. HoweCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Clavey v. LoneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- Hogan v. HorsfallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- See v. JoughinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Patterson v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Grant Memorial Park, Inc. v. Robla School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Powell v. LamptonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- Strain v. East Bay Municipal Utility DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.