Legal Opinion

Hogan v. Horsfall

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 13, 1928No. Docket No. 6237PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTyler, P. J.

Suit in equity to set aside a deficiency judgment obtained in an action for the foreclosure of a mortgage. The bill contains three counts. Under the first it is alleged, in substance, that the property sold by the commissioner was, by reason of an error in the description, not the property he was authorized to sell under the foreclosure decree, hence there could be no valid deficiency judgment. The second is the same as the first, with the exception of the statement that the error in the description was intentional and was therefore a fraud. In the third it was alleged that there was an…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Gray v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Prince v. LambCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Buckley v. HoweCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Hite v. Mercantile Tr. Co. of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Dickey v. GibsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Jeffords v. YoungCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  2. Vilardo v. County of SacramentoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  3. Fallon v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  4. Huron College v. YetterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  5. Church v. ChurchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API