Legal Opinion
Strain v. East Bay Municipal Utility District
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 4, 1937No. Civ. 5824PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.
—The plaintiff has appealed from a judgment which was rendered against him pursuant to an order sustaining a demurrer to an amended complaint for injunctive relief, without leave‘to amend.
The amended complaint alleges that the plaintiff is a resident and taxpayer in the East Bay Municipal Utility District, which is a quasi-municipal corporation organized under the laws of California; that the Hawaiian Sugar Refining Corporation, Limited, is a private corporation owning a large sugar refining industry located at Crockett in Contra Costa County; that the defendant and the sugar refining company…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- McBean v. City of FresnoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- In Re East Bay Etc. Water Bonds of 1925California Supreme Court · 1925
- Bliss v. HamiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- See v. JoughinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
3Cited by3 opinions
- The Housing Authority v. DockweilerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Eastern Municipal Water District v. ScottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Trumbo v. Crestline Lake Arrowhead Water AgencyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967