Legal Opinion

See v. Joughin

California Supreme Court

Decided September 4, 1941No. L. A. 17105PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.

By this action in equity plaintiff sought to have a trust declared upon certain real property for her benefit. Claim to relief was based upon allegations of extrinsic fraud on the part of defendants in procuring a decree of foreclosure upon this land. The question to be determined is whether the plaintiff is barred from maintaining this action by virtue of a former adjudication in litigation between the same parties over the same subject matter.

On February 19, 1934, the plaintiff filed her original action in the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Hearing was had on the second amended…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Gould v. Evansville & Crawfordsville R. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Goddard v. Security Title Insurance & Guarantee Co.California Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Newhall v. HatchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  4. In re Estate of LambCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Dyment v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Keidatz v. AlbanyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Kanarek v. BugliosiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  3. Morrison v. J. D. WillhoitCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  4. Wilson v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  5. Olds v. PeeblerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API