Legal Opinion

Patterson v. Davis

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 5, 1953No. Civ. 4802PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.

Consolidated actions to set aside a deed and to recover for alleged services performed.

Jesse Patterson married his wife Callie in 1915. They took to live with them as their own child, defendant Ruble Lee Davis, Jesse’s niece. In June, 1939, Jesse bought, on contract, a house and lot (the subject matter of this action) for $300, payable $10 per month. Title thereto was to be vested in Jesse and Callie’s names. They moved into the house, which consisted of one bedroom and two other smaller rooms.

In July, 1939, Callie left Brawley, where they had been living, and went to Arkansas on account of…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Herbert v. LankershimCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Brison v. BrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Bacon v. SouleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
  4. Tillaux v. TillauxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Nobles v. HuttonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bradner. v. VasquezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Best v. BurchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  3. Edwards v. LangCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  4. Morris v. BermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  5. Bradner. v. VasquezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API