Thornton v. RCA Service Co.
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Tomlinson
The question here is whether the injury received by Thorton arose out of and in the course of his employment by RCA Service Company and, therefore, compen-sable under our Workmen’s Compensation Act. Code, Section 6851 et seq. Thornton’s petition seeking compensation relates the origin, time, place and circumstances under which the injury occurred. The employer demurred to this petition on the theory that the facts alleged do not bring the case within the Act. The Circuit Judge took that view of the matter, sustained the demurrer and dismissed the petition. Thornton has appealed.
According to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Leonard v. Cranberry Furnace Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1924
- Hendrix v. Franklin State BankTennessee Supreme Court · 1926
- Whaley v. Patent Button Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1947
- Scott v. ShinnTennessee Supreme Court · 1937
- Chamber of Commerce v. TurnerTennessee Supreme Court · 1929
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Orman v. Williams Sonoma, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1991
- Blankenship v. American Ordnance Systems, LLSTennessee Supreme Court · 2005
- Wilhelm v. KrogersTennessee Supreme Court · 2007
- Jackson v. Clark & Fay, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1954
- Hudson v. Thurston Motor Lines, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1979
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.