Legal Opinion

Scott v. Shinn

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided May 22, 1937PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice DeHaven

The plaintiff, Mrs. Mabel Lucille Scott, widow of James Brandon Scott, is seeking in this suit to recover statutory benefits for herself and children to which she 'claims they are entitled, under the Workmen’s Compensation Law (Code 1932, section 6851 et seq.), by reason of his death.

The deceased, James Brandon Scott, was employed by defendant, E. S. M. Shinn, doing business as Nehi Bottling Company, as driver-salesman, and, as such, was required to drive a delivery truck and make deliveries of bottled beverages from tbe Nehi Bottling Company to retail dealers. 0[n M'ay 28, 1926', iScott, in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McNicol's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  2. Archibald v. Workmen's Compensation CommissionerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Baum v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Buvia v. Oscar Daniels Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Patten Hotel Co. v. MilnerTennessee Supreme Court · 1921

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Thornton v. RCA Service Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Jackson v. Clark & Fay, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Hudson v. Thurston Motor Lines, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Foreman v. Automatic Systems, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Knox v. BatsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1966

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API