Legal Opinion
Wilhelm v. Krogers
Tennessee Supreme Court
Decided August 17, 2007No. E2006-00268-SC-WCM-WCPublishedCited by 60 opinions
1Opinion of the Court 1
OPINION
2Opinion of the Court · WadeGary R. Wade, J.
in which JANICE M. HOLDER and CORNELIA A. CLARK, JJ., and E. RILEY ANDERSON, Sp.J., joined.
In 2004, the plaintiff, Michael Wilhelm, filed a workers’ compensation claim alleging an injury to his back and left hip. In response, the defendant, Krogers d/b/a Peyton’s Southeastern, denied the claim, asserting that the injuries did not arise out of his employment. At the conclusion of the trial, the trial court awarded the plaintiff a 35% permanent partial disability to the body as a whole. The Special Workers’ Compensation Appeals Panel affirmed the judgment. Because, however, the injuries…
3Cases cited20 opinions
- Orman v. Williams Sonoma, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1991
- Underwood v. Zurich Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1993
- Perrin v. Gaylord Entertainment Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2003
- Fink v. CaudleTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
- Galloway v. Memphis Drum ServiceTennessee Supreme Court · 1991
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by60 opinions
- Lon Cloyd v. Hartco Flooring CompanyTennessee Supreme Court · 2008
- Tryon v. Saturn Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2008
- Clarence Trosper v. Armstrong Wood Products, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2008
- Foreman v. Automatic Systems, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2008
- Crew v. First Source Furniture GroupTennessee Supreme Court · 2008
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.