Hudson v. Thurston Motor Lines, Inc.
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FONES, Justice.
This is an appeal from the trial court’s denial of workmen’s compensation benefits to plaintiff Mark H. Hudson, a twenty-three year old truck driver employed by defendant Thurston Motor Lines. The trial court found that Hudson was within the course of his employment at the time of his injury and that he suffered a ninety-two and one-half percent permanent partial disability. The only issue raised on appeal is whether the trial court was correct in holding that Hudson’s injury did not arise out of his employment. We reverse.
The material facts upon which that issue…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Claim of Katz v. A. Kadans & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1922
- Whiting-Mead Commercial Co. v. Indus. Accident Comm'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- Thornton v. RCA Service Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1949
- Jackson v. Clark & Fay, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1954
- Beem v. H. D. Lee Mercantile Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1935
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Orman v. Williams Sonoma, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1991
- Braden v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1992
- Wait v. Travelers Indemnity Co. of IllinoisTennessee Supreme Court · 2007
- Lollar v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1989
- Bell v. Kelso Oil Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1980
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.