Legal Opinion

Whaley v. Patent Button Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided January 11, 1947PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gailor

This case was brought under the Workmen’s Compensation Act, Code 1932, sec. 6851 et seq., and the Chancellor made an award for total, permanent disability. On this appeal, it is insisted that while the injury was received “in the course of the employment,” that it did not ‘ ‘ arise out of the employment. ’ ’

The salient facts are these: The 'Patent Button Company operates a button factory in Knoxville, Tennessee. An ex-soldier, named Walter Roach, had undertaken to secure employment there by operating’a button molding, machine. He showed himself either unfit for the operation of the machine or…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. McNicol's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  2. Claim of Katz v. A. Kadans & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1922
  3. London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. McCoySupreme Court of Colorado · 1935
  4. Buvia v. Oscar Daniels Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Patten Hotel Co. v. MilnerTennessee Supreme Court · 1921

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Howard v. Harwood's Restaurant Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
  2. Thornton v. RCA Service Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Jackson v. Clark & Fay, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Hudson v. Thurston Motor Lines, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Hopson v. Hungerford Coal Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1948

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API