Legal Opinion

S. S. Kresge Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided August 28, 1950No. C. D. 1269PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Oliver, Chief Judge:

The merchandise at bar consists of certain articles invoiced as “hand painted paper mache figures” imported from Italy. It was classified under paragraph 1513 of the Tariff Act of 1930 at 70 per centum ad valorem for “all other toys, * * * not specially provided for,” and is claimed dutiable under paragraph 1403 of the same act at the rate of 25 per centum ad valorem as “manufactures of papier-máché, not specially provided for.” The defendant subsequently claimed that if the merchandise is not dutiable as “toys,” the court should hold these figures to be dolls and that the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Morse Bros. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  2. Louis Wolf & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1945
  3. Pressner v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1941

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Fred Bronner Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  2. J. M. Rodgers Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  3. New York Merchandise Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  4. Brechner Bros. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  5. Domestic Marble & Stone Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API