Legal Opinion

Barum Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided April 8, 1953No. 57251; protest 174697-K (New York)PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Oliver, Chief Judge:

This case relates to two items, described on the invoice as “ART. 744 — Elephant” and “ART. 745 — -Monkey,” which were classified as toys, in chief value of rubber, and assessed with duty at the rate of 50 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 1513 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by T. D. 51898, which supplemented T. D. 51802. Plaintiff claims that the the articles are properly classifiable under the provision for dolls, of whatever material composed, in paragraph 1513, as modified by T. D. 50797, and dutiable at the rate of 35 per centum ad valorem.

Samples of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. May Department Stores Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  2. Louis Wolf & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1945
  3. American Import Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1949

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Janex Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1978
  2. Brechner Bros. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  3. Cody Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954
  4. Gold-Silver v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1955
  5. New York Merchandise Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API