Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Application of Wilhelm Neugebauer, Martha Tomanek and Hans Behmenburg

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 9, 1964No. Patent Appeal 7097PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RICH, Judge.

This appeal is from the decision of the Patent Office Board of Appeals which affirmed the rejection of claims 126 to 162 in appellants’ application serial No. 662,319, filed May 29, 1957, entitled “Photographic Reproduction.” Thirty-one claims stand allowed.

The invention relates to electrophotography, in particular to chemical compounds which are photoconductive and thus useful as coatings for substrata on which it is desired to reproduce images. The compounds are 2,5-bis (para-aminophenyl) -1,3,4-oxadiazoles.

In electrophotography, a substratum (e. g., paper, glass, metal foil,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kropa v. RobieCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951
  2. Application of Aubrey A. LarsenCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1961
  3. Application of Maximilian Paul SchmidtCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1961
  4. Application of Jan RosickyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1960

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Application of Arthur R. Tomlinson, Harry H. Hall and William F. GeigleCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
  2. In re KuehlCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
  3. In re GoodwinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1978
  4. Application of Jerome J. KanterCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1968
  5. Glaxo Wellcome, Inc. v. Pharmadyne Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1998

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API