Legal Opinion

Glaxo Wellcome, Inc. v. Pharmadyne Corp.

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided November 4, 1998No. Civ. AMD 96-455PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

DAVIS, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY.......................269

II. THE PATENTS........................................................271

A. The ’431 Patent..................................................271

1. Background................................................271

2. Subject Matter Jurisdiction Over the ’431 Patent.............272

a. Prior motions for summary judgment as to the ’431 Patent....................................................272

b. The renewed motion for summary judgment as to the ’431…

2Cases cited73 opinions

  1. Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  4. Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Preiser v. NewkirkSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Giese v. Pierce Chemical Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1999
  2. Neuralstem, Inc. v. StemCells, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2008
  3. Gallant v. Telebrands Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
  4. Boehringer Ingelheim Vetmedica, Inc. v. Schering-Plough Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2000
  5. Leviton Manufacturing Co. v. Universal Security Instruments, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API