Legal Opinion
Application of Aubrey A. Larsen
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided October 24, 1961No. Patent Appeal 6686PublishedCited by 55 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WORLEY, Chief Judge.
This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the rejection by the Primary Examiner of claims 11 to 20, inclusive, and 22 of appellant’s application, No. 653,289, for a patent on organic compounds and processes of preparing them. All the appealed claims are directed to processes, the claims to the compounds having been allowed.
Since the issue is essentially one of law, the scope of the claims is not material, and it is unnecessary to reproduce any claim here.
The references relied on are
Taub et al. 1,022,645 April…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Wirebounds Patents Co. v. H. R. Gibbons Box Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1928
- In re KluterCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1937
- In re KleineCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1936
- In Re Application of Frederick C. KuliekeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1960
- In re GuinotCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1935
3Cited by55 opinions
- Application of Viktor PapeschCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
- Medtronic, Inc. And Medtronic Puerto Rico, Inc. v. Daig CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- Eli Lilly & Co. v. Premo Pharmaceutical Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Eli Lilly and Company v. Premo Pharmaceutical Laboratories, Inc., Federal Pharmacal, Inc., Seymour N. Blackman, Steven Blackman, John Blackman v. Richard D. Wood, C. Harvey Bradley, Jr., Earl B. Herr, Jr., Cornelius W. Pettinga, Eugene L. Step and Arthur R. Whale, Additional on the CounterclaimCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- In re KuehlCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.