Legal Opinion

Application of Jan Rosicky

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided March 30, 1960No. Patent Appeal 6513PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Judge.

This appeal is from a decision of the Patent Office Board of Appeals affirming the final rejection of claims 1, 5, 11 to 15, 17, 18 and 28 to 36 in application Serial No. 402,590 filed January 6, 1954, entitled “Xanthene Derivatives and Process of Making Same.” Several claims directed to more limited processes have been allowed.

The following claims are considered to be representative:

“1. In a process of producing xanthene derivatives having a basic side chain in 9-position, the steps comprising contacting xanthene in a non-polar organic solvent with a sodium-transferring agent…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Application of Walter Grimme, Werner Keil and Heinrich SchmitzCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1960

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Application of Joseph R. Riden, Jr., and James P. FlavinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
  2. Application of John P. LambooyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962
  3. Application of William C. AnthonyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
  4. Application of Wilhelm Neugebauer, Martha Tomanek and Hans BehmenburgCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964
  5. Monsanto Company v. Dawson Chemical CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1970

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API