Legal Opinion
In re Goodwin
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided May 18, 1978No. Appeal No. 77-596PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RICH, Judge.
This appeal is from the decision of the Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) Board of Appeals (board) affirming the rejection of claims 2-4, 14-20, 22 and 23 under 35 U.S.C. § 103, and claims 21-23 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph, and, under the provision of 37 CFR 1.196(b), rejecting claims 1 and 21 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 in application serial No. 341,841 for “Mold Lubricant and Method” filed March 16, 1973. We reverse.
The Invention
The invention is an improved mold lubricant and method involving application thereof to molds used in glass manufacture. Claims 1, 14, and 21 are…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In re AntonieCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1977
- Application of Arthur R. Tomlinson, Harry H. Hall and William F. GeigleCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
- Application of Wilhelm Neugebauer, Martha Tomanek and Hans BehmenburgCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964
3Cited by15 opinions
- In Re David H. FineCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- In Re Gary E. GEIGERCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Peter M. Roberts v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- Ralston Purina Co. v. Far-Mar-Co, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1984
- In re YatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1981
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.