Legal Opinion
In re Todd G.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided July 7, 1998No. AC 17596PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
2Per curiam
This appeal raises the question of whether a trial court’s granting of an extension of a commitment of a minor child to the commissioner of the department of children and families (commissioner) pursuant to General Statutes § 46b-129 (e)1 is a final *362judgment for purposes of appellate review.* 2 We hold that such an action by the trial court is immediately appealable.
On March 3, 1997, the commissioner filed a petition for extension of the minor child’s commitment to the petitioner’s care.3 The commitment was due to expire on April 11,1997. An extension for an additional twelve months…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. CurcioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Loisel v. RoweSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Madigan v. MadiganSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Taff v. BettcherSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- In re Corey E.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by4 opinions
- In re Cesar G.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- In re Kachainy C.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Sweeney v. SweeneyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- In re Todd G.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1999